Pedestrian Antisemitism

On the proliferation of a disappointingly counterproductive worldview among the right

The Jew is the incarnation of the unnatural… in Rome the Jew was held to be convicted of hatred of the whole human race; and rightly so.

-Friedrich Nietzsche

All antisemites ought to be shot.

-also Friedrich Nietzsche

---

Antisemitic attitudes are thoroughly ingrained into the dissident right-wing of Western politics. So much so, that their actual claims and development are rarely revisited and thereby honed. In fact, they are outright assumed as a sort of precognitive reality. But the justifications for it are hardly mathematical proofs, rather, they are utterly ethereal and obtusely conspiratorial. It is the worst combination possible as far as the formulation of worldviews go: this is as unquestionable as gravity, what we are speaking of here, but it seems everyone has forgotten how this idea was developed - or if it even is the case anymore.

Back in the masses of the mainstream, antisemitism is wrong upon the basis that it is morally flawed, and that it violates the underlying principles of liberalism. Rarely are the actual justifications - the facts of history - discussed. In fact, there is an anxious immune reaction to such a discussion. Never once has the phrase “Let’s have an honest discussion about the Jews” reached the mainstream discourse, and it is unlikely to anytime soon. For dissidents, this is blood in the water. We live for this kind of thing, the indisputable facts of nature and of history lying under the flat-footed boot of incompetent liars. Indeed, this one sentence may encapsulate the entirety of our politics.

But on this topic specifically, it is becoming increasingly apparent that we have lost the plot. The specific claims of these attitudes have gone uncontested for generations, because on one hand the mainstream refuses to entertain them, and on the other hand its proponents have become too lazy and attached to this idea in order to critically refine them. Ideological rot has set in and gone septic. What remains is the following: a barely factual, politically useless, and utterly counterproductive view of the powers at play in history and current events that has lost its sense of scope.

A worldview that previously remained an exclusive enterprise of the academic elite, thrust into the circles of bitter Populares. This is the modern antisemitism of pedestrians.

---

Let’s cut the chase and state flatly what these attitudes are. The Jewish race, and by extension its nation-state and ethnic religion, are nefarious agents against the interests of the West, and hidden power-players behind many of its ills. To concede the obvious, it’s not hard to find evidence of this. The scorn of the gentile in the Old Testament and Talmud, the disproportionate representation of Jews in positions of status in government and media, the long history of Jewish banking practices and usury in Europe. And more importantly, these aren’t exactly contested facts among the academic. It is not difficult to find examples of racial animosity towards Europe from Jews.

But these minute observations of history are not enough, it is not enough to say that one civilizational type is the foe of another. One could make this claim between any two. This is where the rot becomes symptomatic: the claim becomes increasingly exaggerated, increasingly sensational, and increasingly stupid. The Jews, it turns out, are behind every bad event in history. They are not just our enemies, they are our masters, of to whom we are enslaved and have been for centuries. They run our finances, they invent our technologies, they structure our governments, they define our morality, and they enforce our laws.

Let me use one popular antisemitic trope of “the noticers” as an example: the Jewish responsibility for the slave trade. It wouldn’t shock me if a few readers had the following image saved to their phone somewhere or have otherwise internalized this esoteric fact of history:

It’s worth bullet pointing this out.

• It’s sources make zero claims about slavery. Two are census data showing the Jewish population in the US, the middle “hillel” site is the 1921 annual edition of the Jewish yearbook, again, a census containing zero references to slavery or the slave trade.

• The math is hilariously falsifiable. If 40% of the Jews were slave owners “at the height” (lets say 1860 as they think though this too isn’t right), then we have a number of 60,000 slave-owning Jews. If 0.35% of White Americans owned slaves in 1860, then we have ~942,288 slave-owning Whites. If you think 60k is 78% of 1.02M, you might be a retard.

• Other, legitimate sources give an actual answer. And of course, it’s a boring one. The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery states on p. 385: “About 5,000 Jews owned slaves- about 1.25% of all slaveowners in the Antebellum South.”

• The fake sources, terrible math, and odds with historical sources make more sense when you know the source: this comes straight from the Nation of Islam. Specifically, Louis Farrakhan’s The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews.

I didn’t just pick this popular example because it’s so easy to tear apart, because there’s a lot more to it than the aforementioned. The singular, meta problem with stuff like this is that it robs Europe of its historical role and ethnic destiny in favor of a victim narrative, largely orated by the third world.

By claiming Jews were actually responsible for slavery, you’ve just robbed Whites of hundreds of years of their own history and the downstream impacts. You’ve robbed the Antebellum South of its social mores. You’ve robbed the Puritanical North of its abolitionism. You’ve robbed us of Columbus, Lee, Cortes, Custer, Magellan, Cabot - you’ve even told us to slander some of the most titanic men this planet has ever seen because they sympathized with Jews, like Cromwell. All of these men are wiped out by this idiotic and pathetic need to put Whites as helpless victims of the menacing, unbeatable Jew.

I claim all of it for my people, and all of the baggage that comes with it. I will not cowardly cast it out upon some other race.

---

Have you noticed yet, that this is flat out Marxism?

Sit with me for a moment if you want the truth. I tell you, there exists a bloodthirsty and nefarious race of men who seek to turn the world into its playground. They control the global economy, ran the slave trade, started world wars, and dominate narratives. Everything bad that has ever happened in history is their fault.

You know exactly who I’m talking about. Say it with me:

(two crowds yelling at once)

“THE JEWS!” ”WHITE PEOPLE!”

Wait, SHIT!

This is the one form of racism in existence - ever - to claim the opposing foe as unquestionably superior. Proponents have even taken a liking to referring to themselves as “goy” or “gentile” to affirm their status as “cattle” under organizations led by Mexican rappers. The only difference is who they think run the world. At least the race Marxists of today’s undergraduate body are noble enough to correctly attribute that to the West, something antisemites give away to Jews for no charge. It is the need to be a victim, the need to be helplessly and unjustly persecuted. It is slave morality.

How else can you explain and justify carrying water for Muslims? Many prominent antisemites, like Nick Fuentes and his Stockholm Syndrome “groyper” followers, do exactly this by promoting a natural alliance between Christians and Muslims. To end the Jewish menace, of course.

Enter the final stage of festering rot: the total necrosis of one’s worldview. Individuals who amicably started off wanting to rid the West of (Jewish) Marxism, remigrate (Jewish imported) invaders, and rid their homelands of (Jewish) foreign interests, have suddenly found themselves adopting Marxism, allying with invaders, and inviting foreign worldviews to replace the native liberalism of the West.

This is the fork in the road between concepts like “America First” and what we will call “Israel Last”. For the people in this final stage of psychotic spiraling, there is no cost too great that could be paid for the destruction of Jews, Israel, and global Jewry. They will set the ancient standards of their own nations ablaze over it, and some as shown above have already started gathering kindle.

Another small example to illustrate the larger point. For genuine proponents of “America First” ideology, there’s a standard line: “I don’t care about X country. Their problems are their own, let’s focus on stateside.” This of course rebukes the neocon idea that said country must be dealt with to protect US interests - Iran, Ukraine, Taiwan - whatever. But for these individuals, that changes when x = Israel. If you say, “I don’t care about Israel”, they act as if you’ve just shown them your Mossad badge. You’ve betrayed the West. How could you? How dare you? Don’t you recognize that Israel must be dealt with to protect our interests? Now they’re not only Marxists, but they’re neocon Marxists. Surely, there is no great of a price that could be paid to achieve “Israel Last”.

---

Not only have these people perverted and inverted the very thing they set out to do, but in the words of Dostoevsky, they’ve done it for absolutely nothing. Because this entire enterprise has set off largely from a fallacy that the destruction of “global Jewry” will satisfy the specific policy agendas that they’ve already betrayed.

If you believe that this period of mass migration and White replacement is perpetrated by Jews, then naturally the absence of Jews means no mass migration. Then why is the Catholic Church the largest immigrant aid organization in the world? If Israel’s wars in the Middle East are causing this, then how does this explain a quarter of Canada’s population now being Indian? If Israel is uniquely responsible for the criminal act of funneling immigrants into Europe, then why are hundreds of thousands of them coming from - not Israel - but Belarus, slamming into Poland’s wire fences?

If Israel exists to antagonize and hinder the West and White nations, then why were they the *only* nation to support White rule in Rhodesia following the UN embargo? Why did Israeli Jews die in Rhodesia fighting for the RLI? Why did Israel dedicate unrecoverable military and diplomatic capital to try and restore British rule over Egypt & the Suez, only to be hamstrung by Eisenhower?

If every Jew on the face of the Earth disappeared tonight, I can assure you that very little about the West’s condition, and very little about the trajectory of history which has culminated in this point, will change. As Christianity has conclusively shown, you don’t need many of them around to spread their culture. Germany still loses the Great War without being “stabbed in the back”. Toledo still falls in 711 without the gates being opened - do you think the Umayyads weren’t capable of a 3-month siege like they just conquered Cordoba with? The guillotine still drops upon the necks of Ancien aristocrats with ruthless and blind efficiency. Capitalism still happens, the English still end the Napoleonic Wars as the only industrialized nation on Earth.

Europe still conquers the hearts, minds, songs, religions, and territories of the entire world, because that is our history and our destiny, not that of the Jews. This world is ours, its prides and its shames. Ironically, antisemites seek to do the most Jewish thing imaginable by internalizing all of our sins into the Kapparot chicken of the Jewish race, and thrashing them around in religious fervor. I won’t have any part of it.

Those who wish to endeavor into these things should be willing and prepared to investigate to the very limit of understanding. Low-IQ mullings over the Dancing Israelis of 9/11 isn’t satisfying that, and it does absolutely nothing to remedy our current situation.

Jews and Europeans are distinct peoples and distinct cultures. We are going to clash, compete, and at times seek to have the other slaughtered. You don’t have to hand me a copy of Carl Schmitt, I’ve read it cover to cover a handful of times, I understand this. But this arrangement is a clear and far cry away from this Marxist conception that Jews are enslaving us on every front.

Further, the recognition of this as two competing peoples opens up practical political and diplomatic avenues. For starters, Israel’s existence depends upon the West. Wouldn’t it make sense for Zionist Jews to handle the West’s problem with secular progressive Jews who hate us before we even think about handling Israel’s problems? As BAP wrote in his article on Israel:

In principle, Western nationalists should be indifferent maybe to Israel as well. Disengagement from Israel and from the Middle East should be the path forward: if Israel wants to commit suicide, or if it wants to set up a neo-Canaanite empire from the Nile to the Euphrates, let it do as it will. Let that region have its own history. But in practice we face severe opposition from Jewish organizations in the West and Jewish leadership in the West. It hardly matters to me if Israelis are “based nationalists” in their own country (they are not). Their cousins in the West, on who Hazony and Netanyahu could have some influence, are possibly the most effective anti-nationalist faction of any, phenomenally aggressive and very well organized.

A confident American nationalism would demand that men like Hazony and his funders first of all solve this problem for America before they try to modulate America’s vision of itself or make demands regarding Israel’s international standing. There is already a war simmering between the Netanyahu faction and the Jewish left and financial diaspora, and this is good…we should encourage it. But where possible, in private, American patriots should lean on Hazony and especially his donors and handlers to call out, in public, and denounce and disavow the anti-nationalist Jewish leadership in America and Europe. And these must be called out as Jews, namely Hazony, his funders, and Netanyahu should openly say that these very destructive organizations and individuals are a shame to the Jewish nation and are disavowed, and call upon average Jews in the West to reject them.

I do not intend this as a defense of Jews or Israel, quite the opposite. I merely believe that we can clearly state this issue and propose clear situations on it that do not devolve into conspiratorial ramblings. Barely factual, politically useless, and utterly counterproductive views that produce no results at best, and at worst render us into victimized Marxists and mouthpieces for the third world.

An effective advocate for the West is confident in himself and his people, and understands his role in history. It’s time to drop the pathetic slop dumped on us by the Nation of Islam for their benefit and return to a proud, chauvinistic, and sanguine position of our people and how we will act upon the world.