Very interesting. Here in Oklahoma, there is a very large Burmese population that’s appeared in the state over the last fifteen years, and it’s mostly the Catholic Church that is responsible for bringing them here. Specifically, it’s some Catholic charity group based in Kansas (the perfidious Kansan is the enemy of all Oklahomans), so the people of Oklahoma never even got a choice in the matter. The Burmese just started showing up one day and are still coming in.
Just another 15 years before an Oklahama Senator or Congressman will address his, "communities", in Burmese and promise to work tirelessly for Burma and the entirety of their people. Dispossess America to get some government subsidies lining the Bishop's pockets. Promises of more tithes from the future Catholics. They won't be coming just as assimilation won't be coming. They are just going to take the gift and keep it amongst their own.
We all know the only way this is going to be stopped. Oklahomans are tough as nails. They are going to have to become that way again.
I never said antisemitism was wrong in that post, and several times is it pointed out that there are correct ways to go about it.
The primary gripe of the article was how dissidents give to jews what belongs to Europe, imbueing the jew with Europe's sins like a kapparot chicken. And here you are doing exactly that, trying to argue "the jews are doing immigration" when the data in the post conclusively shows the Catholic Church, not jews, is the largest trafficker of immigrants *globally*. Reread both articles with the intent of trying to see what my point is instead of pouting.
You could lob this failure of a slander at Nietzsche and it would flop just as hilariously. What *I* find interesting is that you have zero argument for the content of either article, and can only snark & sass about what you assume my intentions are.
I'm just a smarter and more effective antisemite than you, because I value making correct propositions about them over simply trying to make the most sensational lie possible.
Did the Jew put old Europe into a freezer, and when it fell out it shattered into a million pieces? Are we interested in the truth here or not? This is something the article discussed for a few paragraphs. A few paragraphs you, again, evidently did not read.
Jewish homeland secretary, appointed by a Catholic president, confirmed by a 88% Christian, 74% White senate.
The thesis here is that the Catholic Church was responsible for nearly 30% of all immigrants in the US, until Stephen Miller—a Jew—shut down their funding.
First off they're not "back to back", they're months apart with several articles in between. No point in lying over this.
Secondly if you'd read the article "Pedestrian Antisemitism" you'd see this sentiment already argued against this. How does Jewish wars & influence explain Indians in Canada, or Russia's policy of throwing migrants at Poland's Belarus border as a form of biowarfare?
Thirdly if you'd read this article plainly, it gives clear evidence that the largest trafficker of immigrants is not "Jewish billionaires", but the Catholic Church, and they proudly admit as much.
What is the point in replying to these articles with angry quips if you don't read them in the first place? At any rate you are simply embarrassing yourself.
2.) Actually OSAF does report those figures as they're legally required to. Catholic Charities alone spends 10x more than them on immigrants, $200m vs $20m annually. Include the Catholic Church at large and you might as well stop counting.
3.) The assessment that the Catholic Church is the largest immigrant aid group in existence comes from a.) Their website and b.) Figures pertaining to their published impact statements and financing reports. Compared to other immigrant aid groups such as HIAS, they are absolutely deserving of that claim.
If you think any of the actual data in the article is wrong, feel free to point that out. In the mean time, "but what if soros lied" is not even a beginning to an argument.
All of the orgs mentioned in this were founded by the Church, funded by the Church, and are ran by Clergy of the Church.
You're probably thinking of the low effort posting of Catholic Charity's board recently. First off they were showing CLINIC, not CC, and secondly it wasn't even CLINIC's board - it was an employee directory of their contracted lawyers.
Let's say you're right anyways. These organizations are really just a bunch of Jews trying to replace Whites. Why then is the Catholic Church paying them billions of dollars to do it?
HIAS receives a fraction of the funding and returns a fraction of the impact compared to the Catholic Church, see Complicit Clergy figures from DHS above. The Church is the largest immigrant aid organization in the world, this is well substantiated in the post. Also feel free to look at the boards of CC & CLINIC and be hit in the face with dozens of Catholic bishops with French & Irish surnames.
You're making the exact claim that this post undercuts. These aren't "useful idiots", it is the primary driving force of immigrant aid and aid to 3rd world countries. It's not judeobolshevism, it's simple and well intended Christian compassion.
No, I don't, because they're not secondary actors. The Catholic Church is the largest immigrant aid organization in the world. And you're just repeating conjectures in the face of contrary evidence
Very interesting. Here in Oklahoma, there is a very large Burmese population that’s appeared in the state over the last fifteen years, and it’s mostly the Catholic Church that is responsible for bringing them here. Specifically, it’s some Catholic charity group based in Kansas (the perfidious Kansan is the enemy of all Oklahomans), so the people of Oklahoma never even got a choice in the matter. The Burmese just started showing up one day and are still coming in.
Just another 15 years before an Oklahama Senator or Congressman will address his, "communities", in Burmese and promise to work tirelessly for Burma and the entirety of their people. Dispossess America to get some government subsidies lining the Bishop's pockets. Promises of more tithes from the future Catholics. They won't be coming just as assimilation won't be coming. They are just going to take the gift and keep it amongst their own.
We all know the only way this is going to be stopped. Oklahomans are tough as nails. They are going to have to become that way again.
As a Catholic, this hurts to see. Excellent article.
Many Catholics speaking out against this, wanting to take their Church back. Look into orgs like CatholicVote
Thanks.
This is dark.
But why? What do they gain?
The feeling of being a good citizen of weimerica
I never said antisemitism was wrong in that post, and several times is it pointed out that there are correct ways to go about it.
The primary gripe of the article was how dissidents give to jews what belongs to Europe, imbueing the jew with Europe's sins like a kapparot chicken. And here you are doing exactly that, trying to argue "the jews are doing immigration" when the data in the post conclusively shows the Catholic Church, not jews, is the largest trafficker of immigrants *globally*. Reread both articles with the intent of trying to see what my point is instead of pouting.
You could lob this failure of a slander at Nietzsche and it would flop just as hilariously. What *I* find interesting is that you have zero argument for the content of either article, and can only snark & sass about what you assume my intentions are.
I'm just a smarter and more effective antisemite than you, because I value making correct propositions about them over simply trying to make the most sensational lie possible.
Did the Jew put old Europe into a freezer, and when it fell out it shattered into a million pieces? Are we interested in the truth here or not? This is something the article discussed for a few paragraphs. A few paragraphs you, again, evidently did not read.
It shouldn't be a new one because I said it in the article. Which you didn't read.
Jewish homeland secretary, appointed by a Catholic president, confirmed by a 88% Christian, 74% White senate.
The thesis here is that the Catholic Church was responsible for nearly 30% of all immigrants in the US, until Stephen Miller—a Jew—shut down their funding.
You're a moron.
First off they're not "back to back", they're months apart with several articles in between. No point in lying over this.
Secondly if you'd read the article "Pedestrian Antisemitism" you'd see this sentiment already argued against this. How does Jewish wars & influence explain Indians in Canada, or Russia's policy of throwing migrants at Poland's Belarus border as a form of biowarfare?
Thirdly if you'd read this article plainly, it gives clear evidence that the largest trafficker of immigrants is not "Jewish billionaires", but the Catholic Church, and they proudly admit as much.
What is the point in replying to these articles with angry quips if you don't read them in the first place? At any rate you are simply embarrassing yourself.
1.) That's not what geopolitics is.
2.) Actually OSAF does report those figures as they're legally required to. Catholic Charities alone spends 10x more than them on immigrants, $200m vs $20m annually. Include the Catholic Church at large and you might as well stop counting.
3.) The assessment that the Catholic Church is the largest immigrant aid group in existence comes from a.) Their website and b.) Figures pertaining to their published impact statements and financing reports. Compared to other immigrant aid groups such as HIAS, they are absolutely deserving of that claim.
If you think any of the actual data in the article is wrong, feel free to point that out. In the mean time, "but what if soros lied" is not even a beginning to an argument.
All of the orgs mentioned in this were founded by the Church, funded by the Church, and are ran by Clergy of the Church.
You're probably thinking of the low effort posting of Catholic Charity's board recently. First off they were showing CLINIC, not CC, and secondly it wasn't even CLINIC's board - it was an employee directory of their contracted lawyers.
Let's say you're right anyways. These organizations are really just a bunch of Jews trying to replace Whites. Why then is the Catholic Church paying them billions of dollars to do it?
HIAS receives a fraction of the funding and returns a fraction of the impact compared to the Catholic Church, see Complicit Clergy figures from DHS above. The Church is the largest immigrant aid organization in the world, this is well substantiated in the post. Also feel free to look at the boards of CC & CLINIC and be hit in the face with dozens of Catholic bishops with French & Irish surnames.
You're making the exact claim that this post undercuts. These aren't "useful idiots", it is the primary driving force of immigrant aid and aid to 3rd world countries. It's not judeobolshevism, it's simple and well intended Christian compassion.
No, I don't, because they're not secondary actors. The Catholic Church is the largest immigrant aid organization in the world. And you're just repeating conjectures in the face of contrary evidence